Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Shootmenot dammit wrote: Either the HBC was not what you thought, or you don't mind mingling with crooks. There's a third possibility, which is that they have modified their policy. I think this is most likely. Hardly...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2013.01.18 11:56:00
|
2. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Expanded answer (posting from a smartphone does not encourage going into detail) If you're determined to believe that I'm a "company man" HBC stooge then there's not much I can do about that. Maybe I could show you screenshots ...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2013.01.18 09:21:00
|
3. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Shootmenot dammit wrote: Quite a lot of TEST and GSF pilots seem to be supporting you openly, and in order to vote for you, I need to know that there is no stupid HBC/CFC agenda involved. Do you know why we're "supporting y...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2013.01.18 08:57:00
|
4. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You are a very good poster and I'm thinking about giving you my votes, even though I never voted in a CSM election before. Your forum contributions have been useful to me over the years, and I more or less endorse your opinions on several relevant...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2013.01.17 16:24:00
|
5. CCP kicked a plenty of BOTS last night. Is it true? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: I thought the eve-o forum alt pubbie consensus was that all bots were in nullsec Nah, bots are everywhere, but it looks like high sec bots running Lvl4 missions are all the rage now. At least, that's what your CEO says. htt...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2013.01.02 20:40:00
|
6. Botting - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cpt Roghie wrote: haven't we done this discussion once already the past 24h? Actually, with the number of Goon damage control posts in the locked topic, it's understandable that people gets confused. Also, TEST botting is not new. I rememb...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.31 11:51:00
|
7. Botting news exposed! Read all about it! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Arec Bardwin wrote: La Nariz wrote: Andrea Roche wrote: I knew this was happening but never to this level. CCP should act! ~braindamagecausinglink~ en24 causes brain damage do not read I see goon indoctrination ...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.31 01:10:00
|
8. Botting news exposed! Read all about it! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Slap Chop wrote: Shootmenot dammit wrote: U mad? U unoriginal. Perhaps. But me using a well-known catchphrase has nothing to do with it. U mad.
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.31 00:51:00
|
9. Botting news exposed! Read all about it! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Slap Chop wrote: Shootmenot dammit wrote: Also, if this was about AAA, we'd have Goons clapping and asking for blood, with an article on The Mittani already. But no, Goons and friends are here overloading the Damage Control II, and The Mitt...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.31 00:43:00
|
10. Botting news exposed! Read all about it! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Slap Chop wrote: Arec Bardwin wrote: Good thing slander, gossip and rumor mongering is totally acceptable for a mmo news website then, and also quite entertaining Unfortunately a few people here seem to mistakenly believe these are fact...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.31 00:33:00
|
11. Botting news exposed! Read all about it! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: If there's anything here to look into it'll be looked into. We'll take that as a promise. Thanks.
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.31 00:05:00
|
12. "The Mittani.com" vs "Eve News24" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Robus Muvila wrote: Oh but because I love waving this around https://twitter.com/j_smedley/status/277294754612539392 Well, he would say that, wouldn't he? Not only you promote his games on your site. He is also a player within the CFC...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.12.26 12:33:00
|
13. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
carbomb wrote: SMT008 wrote: Quote: [Sleipnir, PVP ASB] Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Dread Guristas Co-Processor Tracking Enhancer II Internal Force Field Array I Caldari Navy Warp Scrambler X-Large Ancilla...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.15 09:53:00
|
14. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Arazel Chainfire wrote: 425's before gyro's, TE's etc. give you 347 gun dps at 3+27km using barrage, with a tracking of .099, while using 131.25 CPU and 970.2 pg. Switching to 220's gives you 331 gun dps at 2.7+25 using barrage, with a tracking...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.13 08:57:00
|
15. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maeltstome wrote: We all just like the attention. To give you a definitive answer though: 2x smalleR ASB's are always worse than 1xLarger with reists. Turn off auto-reload on the booster and you are fine. I'd de tempted to get a 30km disrupt...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.12 11:33:00
|
16. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maeltstome wrote: [Sleipnir, Ancil] Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Damage Control II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Warp Disruptor II X-Large Ancillary Shield Booster, Navy Cap Booster 400 Ad...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.12 07:59:00
|
17. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
SMT008 wrote: If you agree to downgrading to 220mms, you can get rif of all the faction stuff, while loosing 30 DPS and 2km falloff. You'll end up with this : Quote: [Sleipnir, PVP ASB] Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Co-Processor II ...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.11 13:19:00
|
18. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Shootmenot dammit wrote: It is, goddamit. But the gyros+co-processor+scrambler make this fitting close to 700 millions (hull included), approximately. I want to convince myself that, come a situation where I have...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.11 12:12:00
|
19. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Dibblerette wrote: SMT008 wrote: Quote: [Sleipnir, PVP ASB] Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Dread Guristas Co-Processor Tracking Enhancer II Internal Force Field Array I Caldari ...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.11 12:00:00
|
20. Sleipnir fit: double Large ASB, X-ASB or double X-ASB? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maeltstome wrote: Garviel Tarrant wrote: http://shadowcartel.com/kb/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=20847 Look at damage taken. Its a stupid ******* fit that is stupidly ******* good. (You need to copy the link for some reason) That's quite...
- by Shootmenot dammit - at 2012.09.11 10:29:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |